NVIDIA GeForce MX230 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1519 MHz versus 928 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 11x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 110 Watt
- 1201.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 versus 28.29
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 versus 47.404
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3335
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3335
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 9 October 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz versus 928 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 110 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 versus 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 versus 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3335 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 versus 1830
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 versus 214
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 versus 6740
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 versus 21.591
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 versus 445.82
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 versus 1.736
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 versus 2680
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 versus 2680
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 versus 1830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 versus 214 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 versus 6740 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 versus 21.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 versus 445.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 versus 1.736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 versus 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 versus 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3705 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 2527 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 7900 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 592.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP108 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 9 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 981 | 846 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX230 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
