NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9088 vs 7888
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2097
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3127
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2097
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3127
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 February 2019 vs 5 May 2015
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 9088 vs 7888
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4027 vs 2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 vs 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4027 vs 2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 vs 3127

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 937 MHz
  • Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1038 MHz
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3357
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 937 MHz
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6862 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6862 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9088
7888
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4027
2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3710
3127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
6862
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4027
2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3710
3127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
6862
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX250 AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 2423
PassMark - G2D Mark 242
Geekbench - OpenCL 9088 7888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4027 2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 6862
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4027 2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 6862
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 888

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 1.0
Code name GP108B Oland
Launch date 21 February 2019 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 885 832
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1038 MHz 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 937 MHz 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 1,800 million 1,040 million
Floating-point performance 806.4 gflops
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB / s