NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 36.898
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 170.785
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 1.373
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 18.937
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 3629
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3684
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3331
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 3629
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3684
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3331
• 25.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 vs 35

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2451 vs 2399
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 443 vs 240
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9826 vs 9257
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 vs 141.816

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2399 2451
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 443
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9257 9826
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.992 36.898
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	535.24 170.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.64 1.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.7 18.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.816 160.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 3629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 3629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3331
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 35

Compare specifications (specs)