NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16960 vs 9204
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 46.992
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 vs 535.24
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 vs 2.64
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 44.7
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 141.816
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 4027
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 4027
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 21 February 2019 |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16960 vs 9204 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 vs 46.992 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 vs 535.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 vs 2.64 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 44.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 vs 141.816 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 vs 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 vs 4027 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2173
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2173
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 420 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16960 | 9204 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 46.992 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 535.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 2.64 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 44.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 141.816 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 4027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2418 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP108B |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 21 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 901 | 902 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T400 with others
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
