NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16965 vs 9236
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 46.992
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 vs 535.24
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 vs 2.64
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 44.7
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 141.816
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 4027
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 4027

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• 2.2x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 420 MHz
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 30 Watt
• 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2173
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2173

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	16965 9236
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.805 46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.059 535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.961 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222.15 141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5088 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2173 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5088 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2173 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3357

Compare specifications (specs)