NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1594 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 814.4x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10851 vs 9425
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 215
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2452 vs 2278
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 17 May 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10851 vs 9425 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 215 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2452 vs 2278 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2784
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2784
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 3808
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 3808
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 3808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10851 | 9425 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 215 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2452 | 2278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 4330 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP108 | GP108 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 17 May 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 765 | 905 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 1,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 48.06 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
