NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD FirePro D500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD FirePro D500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 675x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 69.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 13.7x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 274 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 274 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17637 vs 12508
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6020 vs 4655
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6020 vs 4655
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17637 vs 12508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 vs 4655 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D500
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12508 | 17637 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD FirePro D500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 681 | 668 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 243.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5250
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
