NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce 940M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1176 MHz
1664.8x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 33 Watt
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 1127
Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 154
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13562 vs 5982
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 2132
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3065
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 2132
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3065
2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 506

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed	1354 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz vs 1176 MHz
Texture fill rate	46.98 GTexel/s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2807 vs 1127
PassMark - G2D Mark	235 vs 154
Geekbench - OpenCL	13562 vs 5982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4655 vs 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4655 vs 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3065
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1247 vs 506

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2807

1127

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

235

154

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

13562

5982

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4655

2132

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3065

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4655

2132

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3065

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3357

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1247

506

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	NVIDIA GeForce 940M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2807	1127
PassMark - G2D Mark	235	154
Geekbench - OpenCL	13562	5982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4655	2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4655	2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1247	506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		25.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		168.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		21.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		101.399

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP107	GM108
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	13 March 2015
Place in performance rating	654	1184
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	1176 MHz
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	1072 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	58.72 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	29.36 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1.879 TFLOPS
Pipelines	640	384
Pixel fill rate	23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	46.98 GTexel/s	28.22 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt	33 Watt
Transistor count	3300 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		903.2 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	56.06 GB/s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory		0
API support
DirectX		12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL		4.5
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus