NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 950 MHz
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 1202
3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13562 vs 3802
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 2283
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3299
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1913
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 2283
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3299
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1913
3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 414

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 22 March 2012
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz vs 950 MHz
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 45 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2807 vs 1202
Geekbench - OpenCL	13562 vs 3802
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4655 vs 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4655 vs 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1247 vs 414

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 vs 235

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	239 vs 235

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2807

1202

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

235

239

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

13562

3802

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4655

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4655

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

1913

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1247

414

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2807	1202
PassMark - G2D Mark	235	239
Geekbench - OpenCL	13562	3802
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4655	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4655	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1247	414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		23.111

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP107	GK107
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	22 March 2012
Place in performance rating	654	1188
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	950 MHz
Core clock speed	1354 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	58.72 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	29.36 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1.879 TFLOPS
Pipelines	640	384
Pixel fill rate	23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	46.98 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	3300 million	1,270 million
CUDA cores		384
Floating-point performance		652.8 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	56.06 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory		0
API support
DirectX		12 API
OpenCL		1.1
OpenGL		4.5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus