NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 351.6x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12021 vs 4655
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 vs 3715
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 vs 3356
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12021 vs 4655
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 vs 3715
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12021 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12021 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 5034 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 5034 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 15 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 654 | 278 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1670 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 4,400 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
API support |
||
| Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
