NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1127 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• 652.5x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 250.3x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3335
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3335
• 7.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 162

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 2807
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 235
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 13562
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 4655
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 4655

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2807 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	235 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	13562 18734
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4655 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4655 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1247 162

Compare specifications (specs)