NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 955 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 4893.2x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 896 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 vs 596
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 5874
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 1155
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1850
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2691
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 1155
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1850
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2691
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 955 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 vs 596 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 5874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2691 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 307
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 307 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 596 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 519 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 5874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2691 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Exo |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 926 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 955 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 5 | |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |