NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- 14.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 142
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 vs 142 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 Aug 2020 |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 142 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Tiger Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 2 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 1698 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 105.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Compute units | 96 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |