NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 4230x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 vs 1516
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 172
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 6325
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 vs 312.94
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 2486
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3587
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 2486
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3587
- 3.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 585
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 28 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 vs 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 vs 312.94 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3587 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 vs 585 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 312.94 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM108 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 28 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 1071 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 993 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 954 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience |