NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1155 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 4111.2x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 396 vs 151
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5784 vs 1096
- 6.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38658 vs 5771
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2022 vs 12 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 vs 151 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5784 vs 1096 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38658 vs 5771 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 832 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 | 151 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5784 | 1096 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38658 | 5771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
Code name | GA107 | GM108 |
Launch date | May 2022 | 12 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 323 | 1235 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | unknown | |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 16.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 2002 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |