NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1270.1x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5784 vs 5029
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38658 vs 17466
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2022 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5784 vs 5029 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38658 vs 17466 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1155 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 396
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 832 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1155 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 396 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 | 457 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5784 | 5029 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38658 | 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA107 | GP107 |
| Launch date | May 2022 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 323 | 586 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | unknown | 3,300 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX570 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX570 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX570 vs
ATIFireGL V7600
NVIDIAGeForce MX570 vs
AMDFireStream 9170
NVIDIAGeForce MX570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAGeForce MX570 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAGeForce MX570 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
