NVIDIA GeForce MX570A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 1683.8x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 43.9 billion / sec
- 4.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6154 vs 3931
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39907 vs 13443
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2022 vs 7 December 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 43.9 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 480 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1280 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6154 vs 3931 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39907 vs 13443 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 vs 389
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 832 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 vs 389 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 475 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6154 | 3931 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39907 | 13443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GA107 | GF110 |
| Launch date | May 2022 | 7 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 318 | 708 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Price now | $99.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1464 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 480 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 43.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 219 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
