NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 832 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 2048 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 55 / 65 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz
| Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 55 / 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | G9x |
| Code name | GA107 | NB9E-GT |
| Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 15 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 55 / 65 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 147.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.462 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 128 |
| Pixel fill rate | 36.96 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
