NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1155 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 1703.2x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 300x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s
| Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 832 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Code name | GA107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 707 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 147.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.462 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 36.96 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 60 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
