NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 607.3x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 131.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 150 Watt
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 10 November 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 131.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 911 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 911 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7655 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42206 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3872 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Neo |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 10 November 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 292 | not rated |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 911 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 131.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 150 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 4,198 gflops | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N / A |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 217.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 6800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |