NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 175 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 17 October 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1920
- Around 50% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8875 vs 5904
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 540
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16170 vs 11355
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 17150
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 17150
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1920 |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8875 vs 5904 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 vs 540 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16170 vs 11355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 17150 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5904 | 8875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 824 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 | 16170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88130 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU106B | TU106 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 204 | 140 |
| Price now | $349.99 | $499.99 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | 42.76 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 960 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
