NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 vs 159.275
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 vs 159.275 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 35% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2176
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18816 vs 16573
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 859
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 vs 87035
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 vs 246.191
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3938.377 vs 3885.018
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 vs 27.053
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 vs 1271.757
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 20969
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 5567
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 5026
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 20969
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 5567
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 5026
- 5483x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10966 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 2176 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18816 vs 16573 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 vs 859 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 vs 87035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 vs 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 vs 3885.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 vs 27.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 vs 1271.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10966 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16573 | 18816 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87035 | 102535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 10966 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 145 | 97 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1515 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 2944 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.8 B | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |