NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 vs 3583.136
- 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 vs 20.669
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 15401
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 3716
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 vs 4193
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 15401
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 3716
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 vs 4193
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 vs 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 vs 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 vs 4193 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- 2.4x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2176
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19743 vs 16528
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 862 vs 856
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 156591 vs 87438
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 243.864
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 27.021
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1269.445
- 6624.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13249 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2176 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19743 vs 16528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 862 vs 856 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 156591 vs 87438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 vs 243.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 27.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1269.445 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13249 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16528 | 19743 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 | 862 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87438 | 156591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 243.864 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 13249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU106 | GV100 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $2,999 |
Place in performance rating | 153 | 151 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1200 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 5120 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.8 B | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |