NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1470 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1650 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3885.018 versus 3583.136
- 8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 versus 20.669
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 15401
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 3716
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 4193
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 15401
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 3716
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 4193
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 7 December 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 versus 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 versus 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 4193 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 2176
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19743 versus 16529
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 862 versus 855
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 157496 versus 87370
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 versus 246.191
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 27.053
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 1271.757
- 6624.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13249 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 2176 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19743 versus 16529 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 862 versus 855 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 157496 versus 87370 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 versus 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 27.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 1271.757 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13249 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16529 | 19743 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 855 | 862 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87370 | 157496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 13249 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU106 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $2,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 151 | 152 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 5120 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 3072 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |