NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14149 vs 10972
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 588
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.337 vs 170.923
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.852 vs 16.732
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 11029
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 11029

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1365 MHz
• 2.1x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1920
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3178.443 vs 3131.344
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 vs 135.923
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1231.051 vs 1141.283
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 7442
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 7442

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14149 10972
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	750 588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	220.337 170.923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3131.344 3178.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 16.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.923 173.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1141.283 1231.051
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20094 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7442 7766
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20094 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7442 7766

Compare specifications (specs)