NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11666 vs 11472
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76671 vs 45331
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 17105
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 5581
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3360
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 17105
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 5581
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3360
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6809 vs 6008
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 10008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11666 vs 11472 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76671 vs 45331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6809 vs 6008 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 732 vs 477
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 vs 477 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11666 | 11472 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 | 732 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76671 | 45331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6809 | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 189 | 187 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 234.9 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |