NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1215 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1379 MHz
• Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16170 vs 9878
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 436
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88130 vs 37928
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.062 vs 214.123
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3729.447 vs 2293.496
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.133 vs 12.704
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 154.621 vs 139.717
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1303.435 vs 692.9
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 14915
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 14915
• Around 82% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8875 vs 4887

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 175 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3350
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3350

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16170 9878
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	824 436
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	88130 37928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.062 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3729.447 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.133 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.621 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1303.435 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22615 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22615 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 8048
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8875 4887

Compare specifications (specs)