NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1455 MHz
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 vs 3583.136
• 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 vs 20.669
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 15401
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 15401

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20187 vs 16133
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 924 vs 819
• Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 156273 vs 87940
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 251.703
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 27.153
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1304.365
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3350
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3350
• Around 50% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13249 vs 8853

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16133 20187
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	819 924
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	87940 156273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	251.703 270.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3742.063 3583.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.153 30.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	153.341 20.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1304.365 1504.373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22615 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22615 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 4193
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8853 13249

Compare specifications (specs)