NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 11616
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 11616
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 3 April 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 11616 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4909 vs 3652
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4909 vs 3652
- 315.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 58
- 315.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 4909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 4909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 18294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 18294 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6769 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 3 April 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 183 | 187 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
