NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 84% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10255 vs 5564
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 16828
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 16828
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1536 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 vs 5564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 16828 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 6.9x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3652
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3652
- 138.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 58
- 138.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 | 5564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 8054 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10155 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | N18E-G0 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 178 | 112 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6144 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
