NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
  • Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129494 vs 70535
  • 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 28731 vs 6473
  • 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 28731 vs 6473
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 September 2018 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz vs 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 129494 vs 70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 28731 vs 6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 28731 vs 6473

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3718
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3358
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3718
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3358
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8390 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 27566 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8390 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 27566 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
129494
70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
28731
6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
28731
6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
27566
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark 16688
PassMark - G2D Mark 943
Geekbench - OpenCL 129494 70535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 395.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5315.753
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 41.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 147.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1728.386
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 28731 6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 28731 6473
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 27566
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 100

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 1.0
Code name TU102 Pitcairn
Launch date 20 September 2018 13 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Place in performance rating 8 10
Price now $1,279.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 17.22

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 925 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 2,800 million
Floating-point performance 1,894 gflops
Pipelines 1024
Texture fill rate 59.2 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 4800 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR5