NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 751
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10704 vs 10180
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57286 vs 55838
- 13.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4851 vs 352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 vs 22 Nov 2019 |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 751 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10704 vs 10180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57286 vs 55838 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4851 vs 352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1237 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1492 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1237 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1492 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 | 751 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10704 | 10180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57286 | 55838 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4851 | 352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA107 | TU116 |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 | 22 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 132 | 283 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1237 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.74 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 8700 million | 6600 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |