NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3714
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3359
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3714
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3359
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 13 November 2018
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 712 MHz
  • Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1057 MHz
  • 3.3x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
  • Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
  • Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85570 vs 50580
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 15760
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 15760
  • Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 vs 4897
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1005 MHz vs 712 MHz
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz vs 1057 MHz
Texture fill rate 222.5 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2304 vs 2048
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 85570 vs 50580
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20206 vs 15760
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20206 vs 15760
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7856 vs 4897

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
50580
85570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
4897
7856
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark 6890
PassMark - G2D Mark 413
Geekbench - OpenCL 50580 85570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4897 7856
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 282.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3403.106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 24.719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 136.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1010.818

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA107 TU104
Launch date 2021 13 November 2018
Place in performance rating 191 195
Type Laptop Desktop
GCN generation Quadro RTX
Launch price (MSRP) $899

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1057 MHz 1545 MHz
Core clock speed 712 MHz 1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) 222.5 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) 14.24 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS 7.119 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2048 2304
Pixel fill rate 42.28 GPixel/s 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 67.65 GTexel/s 222.5 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 160 Watt
Render output units 64
Texture Units 144
Transistor count 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 9.5 inches (241 mm)

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 416.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6