NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 2.5x more core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 10 nm
• 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 1972
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 311
• 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 14238
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 6889
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3462
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3214
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 6889
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3462
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3214

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

• Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10117 1972
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 311
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57885 14238
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3214

Compare specifications (specs)