NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10167 vs 6969
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 384
• Around 57% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5393 vs 3436

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)

• Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10167 6969
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5393 3436

Compare specifications (specs)