NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 619.8x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 8160
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 444
• Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 31098
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 111.55
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 vs 1371.266
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 vs 8.49
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 19.803
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 vs 509.222
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 12645
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3654
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 12645
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3654

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

• 2x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• 7.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 vs 469

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10117 8160
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 444
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57885 31098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	229.393 111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2082.931 1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.561 8.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.68 19.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	599.217 509.222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16098 12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	469 3677

Compare specifications (specs)