NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 298.6x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 150x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57692 vs 55523
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 227.936 vs 150.103
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.93 vs 14.035
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 121.562 vs 27.417
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 11173
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3690
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 11173
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3690
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 27 May 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57692 vs 55523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 227.936 vs 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.93 vs 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 121.562 vs 27.417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15536 vs 10139
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 vs 497
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 568.183
- Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7537 vs 5425
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15536 vs 10139 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 vs 497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 vs 2031.737 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 568.183 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7537 vs 5425 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10139 | 15536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 887 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57692 | 55523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 227.936 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2031.737 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.93 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 121.562 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 568.183 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5425 | 7537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 27 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 270 | 273 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |