NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 5500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 510x more texture fill rate: 82.80 GTexel/s vs 162.36 GT/s
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10146 vs 8791
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57672 vs 44473
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 12069
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 12069
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5413 vs 4813
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 7 Oct 2019 |
| Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s vs 162.36 GT/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10146 vs 8791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57672 vs 44473 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 12069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 12069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 vs 4813 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 78% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 498
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 vs 498 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10146 | 8791 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57672 | 44473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 227.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2031.737 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 121.562 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 568.183 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 12069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 12069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 | 4813 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
| Code name | GA106 | |
| Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 7 Oct 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 269 | 267 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1845 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1670 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.4 TFLOPs |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | 5.2 TFLOPs |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 59 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 162.36 GT/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 6400 million |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Embedded
