NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 82.80 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 150x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57673 versus 55504
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 227.936 versus 150.103
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.93 versus 14.035
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 121.562 versus 27.417
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3690
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 27 May 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective versus 10 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57673 versus 55504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 227.936 versus 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.93 versus 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 121.562 versus 27.417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15537 versus 10144
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 versus 497
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 568.183
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7537 versus 5425
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15537 versus 10144 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 versus 497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 2031.737 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 568.183 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7537 versus 5425 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10144 | 15537 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 887 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57673 | 55504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 227.936 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2031.737 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.93 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 121.562 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 568.183 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5425 | 7537 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA106 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 27 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 270 | 273 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |