NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs AMD Radeon RX 590
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and AMD Radeon RX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1469 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 789
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 9374
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 45591
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 15 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1469 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 789 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 vs 9374 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 vs 45591 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 125.3 GTexel/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 125.3 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 789 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 9374 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 45591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1081 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Polaris 30 |
Launch date | 2022 | 15 November 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 280 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1469 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 175 Watt |
Compute units | 36 | |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |