NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 380
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 7539
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 41907
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 380 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 vs 7539 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 vs 41907 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 90 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 380 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 7539 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 41907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA107 | TU117 |
Launch date | 2022 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 267 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | 3.041 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | 47.52 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |