NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 7119.3x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 2304 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 231
- 16.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 766
- 14.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 3424
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 13 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 231 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 vs 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 vs 3424 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 90 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 231 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 3424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.306 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.855 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.423 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1261 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1261 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2569 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
Code name | GA107 | GF106 |
Launch date | 2022 | 13 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 1355 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $46.56 | |
Price now | $46.56 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 55 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |