NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1405 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 330x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 934
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 6 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 934 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 6.5x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 12873
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72551 vs 49885
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 vs 12873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72551 vs 49885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 934 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 17881 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 72551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2372 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA107 | GP102 |
Launch date | 2022 | 6 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 225 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Price now | $1,200 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 11408 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |