NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro 5500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 153.8 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1536
• Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 85 Watt
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13253 vs 6763
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78982 vs 37259
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 330.903 vs 105.82
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3461.767 vs 1860.146
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.167 vs 11.238
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 143.293 vs 94.947
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 979.608 vs 596.819
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 vs 9175
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3670
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3353
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 vs 9175
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3670
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 817 MHz
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1282 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 654 vs 589
• Around 88% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3426 vs 1821

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13253 6763
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	589 654
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	78982 37259
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.903 105.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3461.767 1860.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.167 11.238
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.293 94.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	979.608 596.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 9175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1821 3426

Compare specifications (specs)