NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 688.4x more texture fill rate: 171.0 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20611 vs 11536
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20611 vs 11536
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7929 vs 3366
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7929 vs 3366
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8917 vs 3723
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8917 vs 3723
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 7 July 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 171.0 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7929 vs 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7929 vs 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 vs 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 vs 3723 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7929 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7929 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 | 3723 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14501 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
Code name | GA106 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 7 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 114 | 177 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 171.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 68.40 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 171.0 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 10.3 B |
Compute units | 36 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |