NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1247 MHz
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1546 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 295 Watt
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 14121
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 791
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 195.478
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 2129.009
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 14.889
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 129.271
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 1328.033
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 14744
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 14744
• Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1669

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

• Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 395.80 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
• Around 68% higher pipelines: 8192 vs 4864
• Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 vs 109075

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20394 14121
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	989 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109075 204168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	323.141 195.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4756.579 2129.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.311 14.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.943 129.271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1474.189 1328.033
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 14744
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 14744
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2671 1669

Compare specifications (specs)