NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1247 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 48% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 295 Watt
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 14121
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 791
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 195.478
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 2129.009
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 14.889
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 129.271
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 1328.033
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 14744
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 14744
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1669
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 7 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1247 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 14121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1669 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 56% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 68% de pipelines plus haut: 8192 versus 4864
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 109075
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8192 versus 4864 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 109075 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 14121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1669 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | GA104 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 7 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 186 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 840 GFLOPs |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 26.7 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 13.4 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 4864 | 8192 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 98.90 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 395.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 279 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 750 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |