NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 4864 vs 1408
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 12712
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 804
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 62641
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 187.131
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 2548.187
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 15.882
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 117.673
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 901.388
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 17812
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 17812
- 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1278
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 29 Oct 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 1408 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1278 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 200 Watt
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1278 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU116 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $229 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 223 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4864 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |