NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 157.1 GTexel/s
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 1408
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 12712
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 804
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 62641
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 187.131
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 2548.187
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 15.882
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 117.673
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 901.388
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 17812
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 17812
- 2.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1278
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 29 Oct 2019 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 1408 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1278 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 200 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 804 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1278 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU116 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 223 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4864 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 125 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Dual-slot |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |