NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 2469.3x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 102.5 billion / sec
- 3.6x more pipelines: 4864 vs 1344
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 291.7x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 6.0 GB/s
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 4413
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 468
- 7.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 15375
- 8.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 36.256
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1029.267
- 11.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 3.037
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 45.894
- 17.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 82.191
- 8.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 3285
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3337
- 8.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 3285
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3337
- Around 65% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1615
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 16 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 102.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 1344 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1615 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Code name | GA104 | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 16 August 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 701 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | Two 6-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |