NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 54% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 70% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 980 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 102.5 billion / sec
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 1344
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 291.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 6.0 GB/s
- 4.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 4413
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 468
- 7.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 15375
- 8.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 36.256
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1029.267
- 11.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 3.037
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 45.894
- 17.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 82.191
- 8.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 3285
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3337
- 8.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 3285
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3337
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1615
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 16 August 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 915 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 102.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 1344 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1615 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1615 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Nom de code | GA104 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 16 August 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 701 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $321.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 980 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 915 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | Two 6-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |